Land Issues in Forest Areas of Yogyakarta Special Region and The Dynamic of Decision Making Process
Main Article Content
Abstract
There is a forest land identified as Ab Gronden, located in Gunung Kidul Regency, Yogyakarta Special Region. Ab Gronden occupation has led to prolonged conflict over land until today. Environment and Forestry Service (EFS) of Yogyakarta Special Region has made a decision of “do nothing†from the policy set by central government to solve the problem. This study intends to examine factors underlying the decision of “do nothing". This type of research is a case study, that is a study on a policy in the context of real life and uses historical approach holistic single case study through the procedures of data collection and analysis systematically. The sources of data in this study consisted of both primary and secondary sources of data and were analyzed qualitatively. The results of this study found the following conclusion factors underlying of why decision of “do nothing†choosed by EFS is because of there is no policy agenda of forest land statue yet. EFS has experience a dilemma and conflict to make a decision relate to: a) the differences in the ab gronden perception among actors, b) multy level hierarchy of decision making, c) there is no initiation of dialogue between related actors. The Organizational Politics Model has not been able to work in decision making of government organizations that are grounded in legal provisions. The do nothing decision was made because the bargaining process between the actors was not running.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Awang, S. A. (2003). Politik Kehutanan Masyarakat. Center for Critical Social Studies (CCSS).
Bachrach, & Baratz, M. (1962). Decision and Non Decision. An Analytical Framework. The American Political Science Review, 57(3 September 1962), 641â€"651.
Bachriadi, D., & Wiradi, G. (2011). Enam Dekade Ketimpangan Masalah Penguasaan Tanah di Indonesia. ARC-Bina Desa dan KPA.
Bappenas. (2009). Strategi Nasional: Akses terhadap Keadilan.
Berger, R. C., Roloff, E. M., & Ewoldsen, D. R. (2015). Handbook Ilmu Komunikasi. Bandung: Penerbit Nusa Media.
Bernstein, S. (2014). Omissions as possibilities. Philosophical Studies, 167(1), 1â€"23. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s11098-013-0229-0
Boyle, C., & Heimans, S. (2014). Take Action or Do Nothing. Equality in Education: Fairness and Inclusion, 51â€"57.
Cohen, K., Moffit, L. S., & Goldin, S. (2007). Policy and Practice. The Dilemma. American Journal of Education, 113(4).
Crenson, M. (1971). The UN-Politics of Air Pollution: A Study of Non-Decision Making in the Cities. US: John Hopkins Press.
Creswell, J. (2005). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
De Vries, M. (2010). The Importance of Neglec in Policy Making. UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Dye, T. (1978). Understanding Public Policy. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall, Inc.
Ekawati, S., Rumboko, L., Rochmayanto, Y., Kushartati, Salaka, F., & Muttaqin, Z. (2014). Kebijakan Land Swap Mungkinkah Dilakukan?. Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Perubahan Iklim Dan Kebijakan, 8(3).
Elder, C. D., & Cobb, R. (1971). The Politics of Agenda-Building: An Alternative Perspective for Modern Democratic Theory. The Journal of Politics, 33(4), 892â€"915.
Fernando, J. (2010). Eksistensi Sultan Ground dalam Hukum Tanah Nasional di Desa Srigading, Sanden Kabupaten Bantul. Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik, 15(2).
Flyvberg, B. (2006). Five Misunderstanding about Case Study Research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219â€"245.
Forest Watch Indonesia. (2014). Potret Keadaan Hutan Indonesia Periode Tahun 2009 â€" 2013. Kartodihardjo, H. (2016). Diskursus dan Kebijakan Institusi-Politik Kawasan Hutan. menelusuri Studi Kebijakan dan rakan Sosial Sumberdaya Alam di Indonesia.
Kartodihardjo, H. (2017). Kepemerintahan dan Kebijakan Kehutanan: Soal Diskursus dan Reduksi Ilmu Pengetahuan. FORCI.
Kay, A. (2006). The Dynamics of Public Policy. Theory and Evidence. UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
Lukes, S. (2005). Power: A Radical View. California: McMillan/Basingstoke Palgrave.
McConnell, A., & ’t Hart, P. (2019). Inaction and public policy: Understanding why policymakers ‘do nothing.’ Policy Sciences, 52(4), 645â€"661. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11077-019-09362-2
Moss, L. S., & Tubbs, S. (1996). Human Communication. Prinsip-prinsip Dasar. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Poerwokoesoemo, S. ( 1985). Kasultanan Yogyakarta. Gadjah Mada University Press.
Poerwonegoro, S. (1953). Djati Djawa.
Purwanto, E., & Sulistyastuti, D. (2012). Implementasi Kebijakan: Konsep dan Aplikasinya di Indonesia. Jakarta: Gaya Media.
Ritov, I., & Baron, J. (1990). Reluctance to vaccinate: Omission bias and ambiguity. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 3, 263â€"277.
Rose, R., & Davies, P. (2014). Inheritance in Public Policy: Changing without Choice in Britain. UK: Yale University Press.
Rostow, E. V., & Friedmann, W. (1972). The State and the Rule of Law in a Mixed Economy. Columbia Law Review, 72(4), 788. https:// doi.org/10.2307/1121291
Steunenberg, B. (2006). Turning Swift Policy- Making into Deadlock and Delay: National Policy Coordination and the Transposition of EU Directives. European Union Politics, 7(3) , 283â€"319. https://doi.org/10-/1465116506066258
Syafran. (2016). Konflik Pertanahan dalam Kebijakan Pertambangan Pasir Besi di Kabupaten Kulon Progo Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. Yogyakarta: Universitas Gadjah Mada.
WALHI. (1999). Lembaga Pembebasan Tanah dalam Tinjauan Hukum dan Sosial. Prisma.
Yin, R. (2009). Case Study Research. US: Sage Publications Newburry Park.