Dual Leadership and Local Policy Implementation: A Case Study of E-Government Implementation in Vietnam

Main Article Content

Hung Dao

Abstract

This study investigates how dual local leadership—embodied by the Provincial Party Secretary and the Chairman of the Provincial People’s Committee—shapes divergent policy implementation strategies within Vietnam’s party-state governance model. Fo- cusing on the politically sensitive and institutionally novel domain of e-government, this study explores how local cadres adapt implementation strategies over time in response to varying levels of policy clarity and political consensus. Employing a qual- itative comparative case study of three provinces—Hue, Dak Lak, and Ben Tre—char- acterized by different e-government development trajectories and strategic choices, the analysis reveals that interactions between the Party and administrative apparatuses generate distinct degrees of political consensus, which, in turn, influence implementa- tion outcomes. The study identifies four emergent implementation types—Symbolic, Self-Directed, Disjointed, and Sustainable—and introduces the ambiguity–Consen- sus Matrix, a conceptual framework for understanding implementation dynamics in one-party regimes. By illuminating subnational political dynamics and the contingent role of dual leadership, this study contributes to the broader public policy literature on policy implementation in centralized authoritarian systems.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
DAO, Hung. Dual Leadership and Local Policy Implementation: A Case Study of E-Government Implementation in Vietnam. Policy & Governance Review, [S.l.], v. 10, n. 1, p. 1-18, jan. 2026. ISSN 2580-4820. Available at: <https://journal.iapa.or.id/pgr/article/view/1305>. Date accessed: 17 jan. 2026. doi: https://doi.org/10.30589/pgr.v10i1.1305.
Section
Articles

References

Bardach, E. (1977). The implementation game: What happens after a bill becomes law.

Bekkers, V. (2012). Why does e-government look as it does? looking beyond the explanatory emptiness of the e-government concept. Information polity, 17(3-4), 329-342.

BenTre. (2021). Decision 90 establishes the Steering Committee for Digital Transformation of Ben Tre province [Quyết định 90 thành lập Ban Chỉ đạo Chuyển đổi số tỉnh Bến Tre].

BenTre, P. s. C. o. (2017). Plan to deploy VNPT-iOffice document management and administration software [Kế hoạch triển khai phần mềm quản lý văn bản và điều hành VNPT-iOffice].

DakLak. (2014). Decision No. 2530 on approving the Project to upgrade the document management and administration system of Dak Lak province [Quyết định số 2530/QĐ-UBND về việc phê duyệt Dự án nâng cấp hệ thống quản lý văn bản và điều hành tỉnh Đắk Lắk].

DakLak. (2018). Decision 2898 on the establishment of the Steering Committee for building e-Government of Dak Lak [Quyết định 2898 về việc thành lập Ban Chỉ đạo xây dựng Chính quyền điện tử tỉnh Đắk Lắk].

DakLak. (2021). Decision 3331 changes the name of the e-Government Steering Committee to the Digital Transformation Steering Committee [Quyết định 3331 đổi tên Ban chỉ đạo chính phủ điện tử thành Ban Chỉ đạo chuyển đổi số].

Fritzen, S. A. (2006). Probing system limits: Decentralization and local political accountability in Vietnam. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 28(1), 1-23.

Gainsborough, M., Dang, N., & Tran, T. (2009).The impact of corruption, public administration, and development: Challenges and opportunities. Public Administration Reform and Anti- Corruption: A Series of Policy Discussion Papers (Vietnam: United Nations Development Program).

Government. (2015). Resolution 36a/NQ-CP on E-Government - [Nghị Quyết 36a/NQ-CP về Chính phủ điện tử].

Heeks, R. (2003). Most eGovernment-for- development projects fail: How can risks be reduced?

Hill, M., & Hupe, P. (2002). Implementing public policy: Governance in theory and practice. Sage.

Hue. (2010). Decision 43 on the Regulations on operation, exploitation and management of wide area computer network [Quyết định 43 về việc ban hành Quy chế vận hành, khai thác và quản lý mạng tin học diện rộng tỉnh Thừa Thiên Huế].

Hue. (2012). Decision 1958 on the establishment of the Steering Committee of Information Technology [Quyết định 1958 về việc thành lập Ban Chỉ đạo Công nghệ thông tin tỉnh Thừa Thiên Huế].

Hue. (2018). Decision 2197 on the establishment of the Steering Committee for e-Government development of Thua Thien Hue province [Quyết định 2197 về việc thành lập Ban chỉ đạo xây dựng Chính quyền điện tử tỉnh Thừa Thiên Huế].

Hue. (2024). Decision 1621 on the establishment of the Steering Committee for Digital Transformation of Thua Thien Hue province [Quyết định 1621 về việc thành lập Ban chỉ đạo Chuyển đổi số tỉnh Thừa Thiên Huế].

Janowski, T. (2015). Digital government evolution: From transformation to contextualization. Elsevier.

London, J. D., & London, J. D. (2014). Politics in contemporary Vietnam. Springer.

Malesky, E., Abrami, R., & Zheng, Y. (2011). Institutions and inequality in single-party regimes: A comparative analysis of Vietnam and China. Comparative Politics, 43(4), 409-427.

MIC. (2015). Ministry of Information and Communication: Dispatch 1178/BTTTT-THH Vietnam e-Government Architecture Framework, Version 1.0 [Công văn 1178 Khung kiến trúc chính phủ điện tử 1.0].

Nguyen, T. T. H. (2010). Research on critical factors of an e-government project: A case study of the state administrative management computerization project in Vietnam Waseda University].

Painter, M. (2013). The politics of state sector reforms in Vietnam: Contested agendas and uncertain trajectories. In East Asia and the Trials of Neoliberalism (pp. 65-87). Routledge.

Politburo. (2014). Resolution 36-NQ/TW on promoting the application and development of information technology to meet the requirements of sustainable development and international integration [Nghị quyết 36-NQ/TW về đẩy mạnh ứng dụng, phát triển công nghệ thông tin đáp ứng yêu cầu phát triển bền vững và hội nhập quốc tế].

Pressman, J. L., & Wildavsky, A. B. (1973). How great expectations in Washington are dashed in Oakland. University of California, Berkeley, LA, USA, xiii.

Prime_Minister. (2001). Decision 112/2001/QD- TTG on computerization of state administrative management in the period 2001 - 2005 [Đề án 112 tin học hoá quản lý hành chính nhà nước giai đoạn 2001 - 2005]. Retrieved from https://chinhphu. vn/default.aspx? pageid=27160&docid=9480

Prime_Minister. (2010). Decision 1605 National program on information technology application in state agency activities for the period 2011 - 2015 [Quyết định 1605 Chương trình quốc gia về ứng dụng công nghệ thông tin trong hoạt động của cơ quan nhà nước giai đoạn 2011 - 2015].

Prime_Minister. (2018). Decision 1072/QD-TTg Establishing the National Committee on e-Government [Quyết định 1072/QĐ-TTg Thành lập Ủy ban Quốc gia về Chính phủ điện tử].

Sabatier, P., & Mazmanian, D. (1979). The conditions of effective implementation: A guide to accomplishing policy objectives. Policy analysis, 481-504.

Van Meter, D. S., & Van Horn, C. E. (1975). The policy implementation process: A conceptual framework. Administration & society, 6(4), 445- 488.

Winter, S. C. (2012). Implementation perspectives: Status and reconsideration. The SAGE Hand- book of Public administration, 265-278. https:// books.google.co.kr/books?hl=en&lr=&id= ZyNQNpnhYqAC&oi=fnd&pg=PA265&ots= xiLjsgjhdb&sig=yy73sFLyGZR9HHkVdSjRY 8bhA0M&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false