Empowering Bureaucracies in Municipal International Policies: Organizational Structures and Governance Transformation of Japanese Municipal Overseas Offices in Southeast Asia
Main Article Content
Abstract
In today's globalized society, achieving balanced national development requires regional strategies that emphasize both domestic and international collaboration. Municipalities must attract foreign tourists, promote local product exports, and support SMEs' overseas expansion. These policies shifted from traditional administrative approaches to those demanding short-term results and practical benefits. This necessitates innovative policy formulation by entrepreneurial municipalities. This study explores the organizational and governance structures that strengthen local bureaucratic systems to effectively implement these international policies. The research methodology includes analyzing policy documents related to Japanese municipal international policies and conducting field interviews with 36 expatriates, primarily from Japanese municipal overseas offices in Singapore and Bangkok, between 2020 and 2023. The findings reveal that in the VUCA era, international municipal networks evolved from one-on-one sister-city relationships to multi-city networks focused on information sharing and project development. Additionally, the organizational structures of international policy-executing bodies increasingly involve partnerships with national agencies and collaborations between municipalities and private companies, including outsourcing certain tasks. Based on these insights, this study presents a developmental model that categorizes international municipal policies into three stages: Traditional Administration, New Public Management, and Network Governance. It also offers policy recommendations for leadership, policy evaluation, and human resource development to empower local bureaucracies.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Amin, A., & Thrift, N. (1992). Neo-Marshallian nodes in global networks. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 16(4), 571-587.
Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543-571.
Bathelt, H., Malmberg, A., & Maskell, P. (2004). Clusters and knowledge: local buzz, global pipelines, and process of knowledge creation. Progress in Human Geography, 28(1), 31-56.
Batten, D. F. (1995). Network cities: Creative urban agglomerations for the 21st century. Urban Studies, 32(2), 313-327.
Blanco, I., Lowndes, V., Pratchett , L. (2011). Policy networks and governance networks: Towards greater conceptual clarity. Political Studies Review, 9(3), 297-308.
Boschma, R., & Iammarino, S. (2009). Related variety, trade linkages, and regional growth in Italy. Economic Geography, 85(3), 289-311.
Bovaird, T. (2005). Public governance: Balancing stakeholder power in a network society. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 71(2), 217-228.
Camagni, R. P., & Salone, C. (1993). Network Urban Structures in Northern Italy: Elements for a Theoretical Framework. Urban Studies, 30(6), 1053-1064.
Coase, R. H. (1988). Firm, market, and law. The University of Chicago Press.
Council of Local Authorities for International Relations. (2014). Local government in Japan 2012 (2014 revised edition). http://www. clair.or.jp/j/forum/pub/docs/jichi-en.pdf
Dyba, W. (2016). Mechanisms of knowledge flow in bottom-up and top-down cluster initiatives. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 3(1), 286-294.
Eisingerich, A. B., Bell, S. J., & Tracey, P. (2010). How can clusters sustain their performances? The roles of network strength, network openness, and environmental uncertainty. Research Policy, 39(2), 239-253.
Fromhold-Eisebith, M., & Eisebith, G. (2005). How can innovative clusters be institutionalized? Comparing explicit top-down and implicit bottom-up approaches. Research Policy, 34(8), 1250-1268.
Furlong, K. (2015). Water and the entrepreneurial city: The territorial expansion of public utility companies from Colombia and the Netherlands. Geoforum, 58, 195-207.
Herrschel , T. (2013). Compet it iveness and sustainability: Can ‘smart city regionalism’ square this circle? Urban Studies, 50(11), 2332-2348.
Humphrey J. and Schmitz H. (2002). How does insertion into global value chains affect the upgrading of industrial clusters? Regional Studies, 36(9), 1017-1027.
Izushi, H. (2012). Regional Economic Development Strategy in the Knowledge Economy Era. In H. Ueda, S. Kitamura, T. Honda (Eds.) Regional industrial policy] (pp. 275–290). Soufusya.
Jankowska, B., & Götz, M. (2017). Internationalization intensity of clusters and their impact on firm internationalization: The case of Poland. European Planning Studies, 25(6), 958-977.
Kern, K. and Bulkeley, H. (2009). Cities, Europeanization, and multilevel governance: Governing climate change through transnational municipal networks. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 47(2), 309-332.
Klijn, E. H., & Koppenjan, J. (2015). Government Networks in the Public Sector. Routledge.
Koch, F. (2015). City regions and their role in Euro-Latin American relations. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 2(1), 363-370.
Markusen, A. (1996). Sticky places in slippery spaces: typology of industrial districts. Economic Geography, 72(3), 293-313.
Martin, R., & Sunley, P. (2003). Deconstructing clusters: chaotic concepts or policy panacea? Journal of Economic Geography, 3(1), 5-35.
Maskell, P. (2001). Towards a knowledge-based theory of geographical clusters. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(4), 921-943.
Porter, M. E. (1990). The competitive advantage of The Free Press.
Porter, M. E. (1998). On competition. Harvard Business School Press.
Provan, K. G. and Kenis, P. (2008). Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(2), 229-252.
Rhodes, R. A. W. (1996). New governance: Governing without government. Political Studies, 44(4), 652-667.
Rychen, F. & Zimmermann, J. B. (2008). Clusters in the global knowledge-based economy: Knowledge gatekeepers and temporary proximity. Regional Studies, 42(6), 767-776.
Skelcher, C., & Smith, S. R. (2015). Theorizing hybridity: Institutional logic, complex organizations, and actor identities: The case of nonprofits. Public Administration, 93(2), 433-448.
Steger, M. B. (2009). Globalization: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Storper, M. & Venables, A. J. (2004). Buzz: Face-to- face contact and the urban economy. Journal of Economic Geography, 4(4), 351-370.
Tödtling, F. and Trippl, M. (2005). One size fits all? Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach. Research Policy, 34(8), 1203-1219.
Trippl, M., Tödtling, F., & Lengauer, L. (2009). Knowledge sourcing beyond buzz and pipelines: Evidence from the Vienna software sector. Economic Geography, 85(4), 443-462.
Wolfe, D. A. and Gertler, M. S. (2004). Clusters from inside and outside: Local dynamics and global linkages. Urban Studies, 41(5-6), 1071-1093.