How Can Regional Collaborative Governance Promote Public Value Through Relational Leadership? Grounded Research Based on Inter-Provincial Collaboration Between Guangdong, Hunan, and Guangxi in China
Main Article Content
Abstract
Studies on regional collaborative governance based on China's institutional context are abundant, but the leadership perspective behind regional collaborative governance has rarely been discussed in previous studies. Based on a review of relational leadership theory, this study adopts the grounded theory methodology to study the three cities bordering Guangdong, Hunan, and Guangxi provinces, condensing the components of relational leadership in regional collaborative governance and the general explanatory framework. The research found that relational leadership in regional collaborative governance is composed of mission-driven, social capital, governance resources, trust shaping, common learning, interaction mechanisms, and public value. Among them, mission-driven is the motivation, social capital and governance resources are the basic conditions, trust shaping and common learning are actions, the interaction mechanism is the carrier, and public value creation is the goal. At present, the main problem of regional collaborative governance is that the governance mechanism is "built but not run.” It is necessary to build an effective network governance system through the relational leadership of leaders, improve the overall public leadership of regional governance, and promote a governance system to operate more effectively. This research not only explores the dynamic leadership process of regional collaborative governance, but also enriches the micro perspective of regional collaborative governance research, expands the theoretical space of collaborative leadership, makes up the "leadership deficit" in the field of regional collaborative governance, and has reference significance and practical enlightenment for further promoting the performance of collaborative governance in the cross-region context.
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of public administration research and theory,18(4), 543-571.
Akram, T., Lei, S., Hussain, S. T., Haider, M. J., & Akram, M. W. (2016). Does relational leadership generate organizational social capital? A case study exploring the effect of relational leadership on organizational social capital in China. Future Business Journal, 2(2), 116-126.
Ayres S. (2019). How can network leaders promote public value through soft governance?. Public Administration, 97(2), 279-295.
Bao, G., Wang, X., Larsen, G. L., & Morgan, D. F. (2013). Beyond new public governance: A value-based global framework for performance management, governance, and leadership. Administration & society, 45(4), 443-467.
Beer, A., Ayres, S., Clower, T., Faller, F., Sancino, A., Sotarauta, M. (2019). Place leadership and regional economic development: A framework for cross-regional analysis. Regional studies, 53(2), 171-182.
Bryson, J., Sancino, A., Benington, J., Sørensen, E. (2017). Towards a multi-actor theory of public value co-creation. Public management review, 19(5), 640-654.
Carifio, J. (2010). Development and validation o f a measure of relational leadership: implications for leadership theory and policies. Current Research in Psychology, 1(1), 16-28.
Carlson, C. A. (2007). Practical guidance for collaborative governance. Portland, OR: Policy Consensus Initiative.
Cepiku, D., & Mastrodascio, M. (2021). Leadership behaviors in local government networks: An empirical replication study. Public Management Review, 23(3), 354-375.
Campbell, J. L., Quincy, C., Osserman, J., & Pedersen, O. K. (2013). Coding in-depth semi-structured interviews: Problems of unitization and intercoder reliability and agreement. Sociological methods & research, 42(3), 294-320.
Chen, S. H., Feiock, R. C., & Hsieh, J. Y. (2016). Regional partnerships and economic development. Journal of Urban Affairs, 38(2), 196-213.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Cristofoli D., Trivellato B., Sancino A, Maccio L., Markovic J. (2021). Public net work leadership and ties that lead to Journal of Management and Governance, 25, 251-274.
Crosby, B.C., Hart , P., and Torfing, J. (2017). Public value creation through collaborative innovation. Public Management Review, 19(5), 655-669.
Doberstein, C. (2016). Designing collaborative governance decision-making to search for a collaborative advantage. Public Management Review, 18(6), 819-841.
Fairhurst, G. T., & Uhl-Bien, M. (2012). Organizational discourse analysis (ODA): Examining leadership as a relational process. The leadership quarterly, 23(6), 1043-1062.
Feiock, R. C. (2013). Institutional Collective Action Framework. Policy studies journal, 41(3), 397-425.
Fung, A. (2006). Varieties in participation in complex governance. Public administration review, 66, 66-75.
Glaser, B. G. (1978). Theoretical Sensitivit y: Advances in Grounded Theory Methodology Mill Valley. CA: Sociology Press.\
Gittell, J. H., & Douglass, A. (2012). Relational bureaucracy: struct uring reciprocal relationships into roles. Academy of management review, 37(4), 709-733.
Goodsell, C. T. (2011). Mission mystique: Strength at the institutional center. The American Review of Public Administration, 41(5): 475–94.
Hansen, K., Mullin, M., Riggs, E. K. (2020). Collaboration risk and the choice to consolidate local government services. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 3(3), 223-238.
Hawkins, C. V., Hu, Q., & Feiock, R. C. (2016). Self-organizing governance of local economic development: Informal policy networks and regional institutions. Journal of Urban Affairs, 38(5), 643-660.
Hilaire, F., S. (2008). Retrospective Exam Hoc Doctoral Program of Administrative Sciences. Leadership theories: toward a relational model. France: Université Laval Québec.
Huxham, C. & Vangen, S. (2000). Leadership in the shaping and implementation of collaboration agendas: How do things happen in a (not quite) joint world?. Academy of Management journal, 43(6), 1159-1175.
Kapucu, N., & Hu, Q. (2016). Understanding the multiplexity of collaborative emergency management networ k s. The Americ an Review of Public Administration, 46(4), 399-417.
Kinder, T., Stenvall, J., Six, F., Memon, A. (2021). Relational leadership in collaborative governance ecosystems. Public Management Review, 23(11), 1612-1639.
Komives, S., Lucas, R., & Mcmahon, T. R. (2013). R evisiting the r e l ational l eadership model: Perspectives from the third edition of Exploring Leadership. Eugene, Oregon: University of Oregon.
Koppenjan, J., & Klijn, E. (2004). Managing uncertainty in networks: A network approach to problem solving and decision-making. New York: Routledge.
Kwon, S. W., & Feiock, R. C. (2010). Overcoming barriers to cooperation: Intergovernmental service agreements. Public Administration Review, 70(6), 876-884.
Moore, M. H. (1995). Creating public value. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
O'Flynn, J. (2007). From new public management to public value: Paradigmatic change and managerial implications. Australian journal of public administration, 66(3), 353-366.
Orr, K. and Bennett, M. (2017). Relational leadership, storytelling, and narratives: Practices of local government chief executives. Public Administration Review, 77(4), 515-527.
Page, S. B., Stone, M. M., Bryson, J. M., & Crosby, B. C. (2015). Public value creation by cross-sector collaborations: a framework and assessment challenges. Public administration, 93(3), 715-732.
Provan K. G., Kenis P. (2008). Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(2), 229–252.
Pestoff, V. (2018). Co-Production and Public Service Manag ement: Citizenship, Governance and Public Service Management. London: Routledge.
Sancino, A., Carli, G., & Giacomini, D. (2023). Relational leadership in local governance: the engagement of mayors with citizens, public managers, and politicians. Public Management Review, 25(9), 1730-1754.
Strauss A. (1987). Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Uhl-Bien, M. (2006). Relational leadership theory: Exploring the social processes of leadership and organization. The leadership quarterly, 17(6), 654-676.
Uhl-Bien, M., Marion, R., & McKelvey, B. (2007). Complexity leadership theory: Shifting leadership from the industrial age to the knowledge era. The leadership quarterly, 18(4), 298-318.
Yi, H., Suo, L., Shen, R., Zhang, J., Ramaswami, A., & Feiock, R. C. (2018). Regional governance and collective institutional actions for environmental sustainability. Public Administration Review, 78(4), 556-566.