Deliberative Governance Principles in Forest Areas Management with Special Purposes
Main Article Content
Abstract
Apart from having educational and development goals, the management of Diponegoro University's Wanadipa Special Purpose Forest Area (KHDTK) also aims to carry out sustainable forest use activities. The management carries out efforts to achieve these goals through a deliberative governance approach, including public consultation. However, the management is not yet satisfied with the results, considering that the community around the forest has not participated well in managing the KHDTK. Therefore, this research aims to analyze deliberative governance in KHDTK forest management by testing three deliberative governance criteria: representation, participation, and deliberation process. This approach is a collaborative effort between managers of Special Purpose Forest Areas (KHDTK) and farming communities around the forest. Mixed research methods were used in this research, with a concurrent embedded model. The qualitative research approach uses key informants as data sources, while quantitative research uses respondents consisting of forest farmers. The results of the research show that KHDTK forest management based on aspects of representation, participation, and deliberation has not run optimally. Therefore, it is recommended that intensive and open communication between KHDTK managers and forest farming communities be improved in KHDT forest management, which will provide benefits to both parties.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Booher, D., & Innes, J. (2003). The Impact of Collaborative Planning on Governance Capacity Working Paper 2003-03 The Impact of Collaborative Planning on Governance Capacity.
Coleman, S., & Blumler, J. G. (2009). The Internet and Democratic Citizenship.
Cook, F., Carpini, M., & Jacobs, L. (2007). Who Deliberates? Discursive Participation in America: Deliberation, Participation and Democracy. In S. Rosenberg (Ed.), Can the People Govern?: Deliberation, Participation and Democracy.
Creswell, J . W., & Plano C lark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. In Designing and conducting mixed methods research approach.
Dean, R. (2023). Deliberat ing Like a State: Locating Public Administration Within the Deliberative System. https://doi.org/10.1177/00323217231166285
Eagan, J. L. (2016). Deliberative democracy. https://www.britannica.com/topic/deliberative- democracy
Fatkhurohman. (2011). Mengukur Kesamaan Paham Demokrasi. IV(2), 37–58.
Fung, A., & Wright, E. O. (2001). Politics & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0032329201029001002
Gutmann, A., & Thompson, D.(2004). Why deliberative democracy?
Hajer, M. (2003). Policy without polity ? Policy analysis and the institutional void. 175–195.
Held, D. (2006). Models of Democracy. Stanford University Press.
Hendriks, C. M. (2009). Deliberative governance in the context of power. 28, 173–184. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2009.08.004
Johansson, A., Beland, K., & Zachrisson, A. (2022). Exploring prospects of deliberation in intractable natural resource management conflicts. Journal of Environmental Management, 315(April), 115205.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115205
Kelompok Petani Pesanggem. (2023). Personal Interviewed as "Model keterlibatan pertanian hutan KHDTK Undip".
Kusuma, T. ., Hadi, M., & Hidayat, J. W. (2022). Struktur Komunitas Kupu-Kupu (Lepidotera: Rhopalocera) di KHDTK Wanadipa Undip Kabupaten Semarang, Jawa Tengah. Bioma.
Oliveras, R. C. (2014). Social Inclusion and Participatory Democracy: From the conceptual discussion to local action .
PT Permada Nusantara Hijau Yogyakarta. (2021). Laporan Akhir Inventatisasi Sumberdaya Hutan dan Sosial Ekonomi Masyarakat Pada Kawasan Hutan Dengan Tujuan Khusus (KHDTK) Wanadipa.
Rafinzar, R., & Khairunnas. (2023). JURNAL AGREGASI Jurnal Aksi Reformasi Government Dalam Demokrasi. 11, 23–39. https://doi. org/10.34010/agregasi.v11i1.6790
Schäfer, A., & Merkel, W. (2023). Emancipation Against All Odds ? The Conservatism Charge to Deliberative Democracy Reconsidered. 19, 1–13.
Sleman, K. (2023). Pengelolaan Kawasan Hutan dengan Tujuan Khusus.
Tando, C. E., Sudarmo, S., & Haryanti, R. H. (2022). Collaborative Governance Effort to Manage Forest in Kalimantan Island : Literature Review . 28 (Apr il), 15–21. https: //doi.org/10.7226/jtfm.27.1.15
Watson, D., Mhlaba, M., Molelekeng, G., Chauke, T. A., Simao, S. C., Jenner, S., Ware, L. J., & Barker, M. (2023). How do we best engage young people in decision - making about their health ? A scoping review of deliberative priority setting methods. International Journal for Equity in Health, 1–24. https:// doi.org/10.1186/s12939-022-01794-2
Weyant, E. (2022). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches,5th Edition.
Witte, M. de. (2021). Could deliberative democracy depolarize America? Stanford scholars think so. https://news.stanford.edu/2021/02/04/ deliberative-democracy-depolarize-america/