Logic Model of Governance Innovation and Public Policy in Public Service

Main Article Content

Lesmana Rian Andhika Heru Nurasa Nina Karlina Candradewini Candradewini


This research aims to provide additional qualitative evidence of the logical relationship between governance innovation and public policy in public services in Indonesia with adopting the logic model. The logic model is often not adopting in the formulation of policies that resulted in the implementation of public sector innovation such as cannot show more significant results. Also this model is believed to contribute in planning and evaluation of government programs. Most of this article based on the literature study and direct observation. The study also refers to some cases were chosen deliberately and treated as evidence by using a descriptive qualitative approach for developing an argument and conceptual framework accordingly. This research resulted in some information. First, governance innovation will provide multi-benefits, not only for the government but will involve a range of other institutions. Second, public policy is treated as a formal legal basis to keep programs planning and evaluation. That way this article is expected to contribute to the knowledge development of logical relationships among governance innovation and public policy in the different local contexts Indonesia from countries which often becomes a reference in managing public service innovation.


Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
ANDHIKA, Lesmana Rian et al. Logic Model of Governance Innovation and Public Policy in Public Service. Policy & Governance Review, [S.l.], v. 2, n. 2, p. 85-98, nov. 2018. ISSN 2580-4820. Available at: <https://journal.iapa.or.id/pgr/article/view/86>. Date accessed: 26 feb. 2020. doi: https://doi.org/10.30589/pgr.v2i2.86.


Agger, A., & Sorensen, E. (2016). Managing collaborativ e innov ation in public bureaucracies. Planning Theory , 1-21. doi:10.1177/1473095216672500
Aghion, P., Algan, Y., Cahuc, P., & Shleifer, A. (2010). Regulation and distrust. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125(3), 1015-1049. doi:10.3386/w14648
Alberti, A., & Bertucci, G. (2007). Innovation in governance and public administration: key issues and perspectives. In Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Innovations in Governance in the Middle East, North Africa, and Western Balkans: Making Governments Work Better in the Mediterranean Region (pp. 3-12). New York: United Nations.
Anttiroiko, A.-V., Bailey, S. J., & Valkama, P. (2011). Innovations in public governance in the western world. Amsterdam: IOS Press BV.
Autant-Bernard, C., Fadairo, M., & Massard, N. (2013). Knowledge diffusion and innovation policies within the European Regions: challenges based on recent emperical evidence. Research Policy, 42(1), 196-210. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2012.07.009
Baekgaard, M., Mortensen, P. M., & Seeberg, H. B. (2018). The bureaucracy and the policy agenda. Journal of Public Administration Resear ch and Theory, 28 (2), 239-253. doi:10.1093/jopart/mux045
Baregheh, A., Rowley, J., & Sambrook, S. (2009). Towards a multidisciplinary definition of innovation. Management Decision, 47(8), 1323-1339. doi:10.1108/00251740910984578
Bovaird, T., & Löf fl er, E. (2009). Public management and governance (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
Bovens, M., & Hart, P. (2016). Revisiting the study of policy failures. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(5), 653-666. doi:10.1080/13 501763.2015.1127273
BPS. (2017). Kabupaten Aceh Tenggara dalam angka 2016. Banda Aceh: Al-Mufadar. Caiden, G. E. (2009). Administrative reform. Chicago: Aldine Transaction.
Cooper, C. A., & Reinagel, T. P. (2015). The limits of public service motivation: confidence in government institutions among public servant. Administration & Society, 89(9),
1297-1317. doi:10.1177/0095399715581039
Craft, J., & Howlett, M. (2012). Policy formulation, gov ernance shifts and policy influence: location and content in policy advisory systems. Journal of Public Policy, 32(2), 79-98. doi:10.1017/ S0143814X12000049
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry & research design: choosing among five approaches (3th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Denhardt, J. V., & Denhardt, R. B. (2015). The new public service revisited. Public Administration Review, 75(5), 664-672. doi:10.1111/puar.12347
Disdukcapil Kabupaten Aceh Tenggara. (2017). Laporan data perekaman penduduk Kabupaten Aceh Tenggara tahun 2017. Kutacane: Dinas Kependudukan dan Pencatatan Sipil Kabupaten Aceh Tenggara.
Disdukcapil Kabupaten Klungkung. (2017, March 10). Predator berkeliaran urus E-KTP masyarakat Klungkung. Retrieved from https://www.disdukcapil.klungkungkab. go.id/baca-artikel/27/Predator-Berkeliaran- Urus-EKTP-Masyarakat-Klungkung.html
Disdukcapil Kabupaten Padang Pariaman. (2017, December 29). Raih zona hijau, Disdukcapil Padang Pariaman terus tingkatkan kualitas pelayanan. Retrieved from http:// dukcapil.padangpariamankab.go.id/index. php?option=com_content&view=article& id=187:zonahijau&catid=88:berita&Item id=2327
Dirjen Dukcapil. (2018, Pebruari 2). Luncurkan Si Dukun, DKI layani 6 in 1 dokumen kependudukan . Retrieved from http:// www.dukcapil.kemendagri.go.id/detail/ luncurkan-si-dukun-dki-layani-6-in-1- dokumen-kependudukan-3
DuBrin, A. J. (2006). Essential of management (9th ed.). Mason, OH: Cengage Learning.
Dunn, W. N. (2016). Public policy analysis (5th ed.). Oxon: Routledge.
Edler, J., & Fagerberg, J. (2017). Innovation policy: what, why, and how. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 33(1), 2-23. doi:10.1093/ oxrep/grx001
Eseonu, C. I., & Wyrick, D. A. (2014). A heat transfer model for policy diffusion. Engineering Management Journal, 26(2), 39- 48. doi:10.1080/10429247.2014.11432009
Fagerberg, J. (2017). Innovation policy: rationales, lessons, and challenges. Journal of Economic Surveys, 31(2), 497-512. doi:10.1111/ joes.12164
Farazman, A. (2002). Administrative reform in developing nations. Westport: Praeger Publishers.
Gerston, L. N. (2010). Public policy making process and principles (3rd ed.). New York: M.E. Sharpe.
Gilardi, F. (2016). Four w ays w e can improve policy diffusion research. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 16(1), 8-21. doi:10.1177/1532440015608761
Gochet, P., & Gribomont, P. (2006). Epistemic logic. In D. M. Gabba y, & J. Woods, Handbook of the history of Logic (pp. 99-195). Netherlands: Elsevier B.V.
Hameed, M. A., Counsell, S., & Swift, S. (2012). A conceptual model for the process of IT innovation adoption in organizations. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 29, 358-390. doi:10.1016/j. jengtecman.2012.03.007
Hartley, J. (2005). Innovation in governance and public services: past and present. Public Money & Management, 25(1), 27-34. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9302.2005.00447.x
Hendricks, V., & Symons, J. (2006, January 4). Epistemic logic. Retrieved from https://plato. stanford.edu/entries/logic-epistemic/
Hill, M. (2005). The public policy process (4th ed.). Essex: Pearson Education.
Howe, L. E. (2014). Administrative law and governmentality: politics and Discretion in a changing state of sovereignty. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 24(1), 55-80. doi:10.1080/10
IGI. (2016, October 24). What is administrative r eform. Retriev ed from IGI Global Disseminator of Knowledge: http://www. igi-global.com/dictionary/administrative- reform/681
Keeler, R. L. (2013). Managing outsourced administrativ e discretion. State and Local Government Review, 45(3), 183-188. doi:10.1177/0160323X13496108
Kemendagri. (2016, Juni 21). Unggah 3.143 Perda, Mendagri berterimakasih ke semua pihak. Retrieved from Kementrian Dalam Negeri : http://www.kemendagri.go.id/ news/2016/06/21/unggah-3143-perda- mendagri-berterimakasih-ke-semua-pihak
Khan, G. F. (2017). Social media for government: a practical guide to understanding, implementing, and managing social media tools in the public sphere. Singapore: Springer Nature.
Kim, S., & Han, C. (2014). Administrative reform in South Korea: new public management and the bureaucracy. International Review of Administrative Science, 0 (0), 1-19. doi:10.1177/0020852314558034
Knowlton, L. W., & Phillips, C. C. (2013). The logic model guidebook: better strategies for great results. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications. Koski, C., & Lee, T. (2014). Policy by doing: formulation and adoption of policy through government leadership. The Policy Studies Journal, 42(1), 30-54. doi:10.1111/psj.12041
Liu et al. (2010). Understanding local policymaking: policy elites’ perceptions of local agenda setting and alternative policy selection. The Policy Studies Journal, 38(1), 69-91. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2009.00345.x
Maggetti, M., & Gilardi, F. (2015). Problems (and solutions) in the measurement of policy diffusion mechanisms. Journal of Public Policy, 00(0), 1-21. doi:10.1017/ S0143814X1400035X
McHarg, A. (2017). Administrative discretion, administrative rule-making, and judicial review. Current Legal Problems, 70(1), 267– 303. doi:10.1093/clp/cux011
Michels, A. (2012). Citizen participation in local policy making: design and democracy. International Journal of Public Administration, 33(4), 285-292. doi:10.1080/01900692.2012.6
61301 Michels, A., & Graaf, L. D. (2010). Examining citizen participation: local participatory policy making and democrac y. Local Government Studies, 36(4), 477-491. doi:10.1080/03003930.2010.494101
Moore, M., & Hartley, J. (2008). Innovations in governance. Public Management Review, 10(1), 3-20. doi:10.1080/14719030701763161
Mortensen, P. B. (2010). Political attention and public policy: a study of how agenda setting matters. Scandinavian Political Studies, 33(4), 256-380. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9477.2010.00254.x
Nassaji, H. (2015). Qualitative and descriptive research: data type versus data analysis. Language Teaching Research, 19(2), 129-132. doi:10.1177/1362168815572747
Navarro, F. M. (2016). From government innovation to public innovation. International Journal of New Technology and Research (IJNTR), 2(6), 4-7.
Osborne, S. P., & Brown, L. (2011). Innovation, public policy and public service delivering in the UK: the word that would be king?. Public Administration, 89(4), 1335-1350. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.01932.x
Paskarina, C. (2017). The making of competitive bureaucracy: a case of bureaucratic reform in west java province. Cogent Social Sciences, 3(1), 1-13. doi:10.1080/23311886.2016.1273748
Pump, B. (2011). Beyond metaphors: new research on agendas in the policy process. The Policy Studies Journal, 39(1), 1-12. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00389_1.x
Roman, A. V. (2015). The determinants of public administrators’ participation in policy formulation. American Review of Public Administration, 47(1), 102-129. doi:10.1177/0275074015577799
Saulais, P., & Ermine, J.-L. (2012). Creativity and knowledge management. The Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 42(3/4), 416-438. doi:10.1108/03055721211267521
Scupola, A., & Zanfei, A. (2016). Governance and innovation in public sector services: the case of the digital library. Government Information Quarterly, 33 (2), 237-249. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2016.04.005
Sen, T. K., & Ghandforoush, P. (2011). Radical and incremental innovation preferences in information technology: an empirical study in an emerging economy. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 6(4), 33-44.
Sengupta, J. (2014). Theory of innovation: a new paradigm of growth. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing .
Siddiquee, N. A. (2008). Service delivery innovations and governance: the malaysian experience. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 2(3), 194-213. doi:10.1108/17506160810902194
Sorensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2011). Enhancing collaborative innovation in the public sector. Administration & Society, 43(8), 842-868. doi:10.1177/0095399711418768
Torfing, J., & Triantafillou, P. (2016). Enhancing public innovation by transforming public governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.