Analysis of the Implementation of Risk-Mitigation Governance in Public Services Near Yogyakarta International Airport

Main Article Content

Idham Ibty Subando Agus Margono Erwan Agus Purwanto

Abstract

The public service risk mitigation implemented by local governments in Indonesia in tackling potential risks and the impact of development on local areas is important for governance reform. This study aims to analyze the public service risk mitigation carried out by the Government of Kulon Progo Regency in the YIA area. This study is a type of qualitative research with an instrumental case study methodology. Data were collected by analyzing secondary data, as well as primary data through interviews and observations. The analysis was carried out using triangulation techniques, policy adoption, comparison, searching for data explanations and inductive reasoning, and FGDs. The study findings show that risk-mitigation governance can shape public service providers to face potential risks due to reducing negative impacts on citizens’ basic rights and inequalities in the community. The risk-mitigation governance implementation runs led by the commitment of risk-oriented-local leaders, harmonization of regulations has not integrated to local-sector- law, stakeholder involvement with engagement the participation of basic service users, the private sector, as well as university, community representatives, media, and NGOs, with a collaborative and adaptable approach. Compliance and synergy among stakeholders are the most important factors forming public service risk mitigation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
IBTY, Idham; AGUS MARGONO, Subando; AGUS PURWANTO, Erwan. Analysis of the Implementation of Risk-Mitigation Governance in Public Services Near Yogyakarta International Airport. Policy & Governance Review, [S.l.], v. 7, n. 2, p. 195-209, july 2023. ISSN 2580-4820. Available at: <https://journal.iapa.or.id/pgr/article/view/660>. Date accessed: 16 june 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.30589/pgr.v7i2.660.
Section
Articles

References

Ahnaf, M. I. (2017). Krisis Keistimewaan, Kekerasan terhadap Minoritas di Yogyakarta. CRCS UGM.

Benson, C., Rossetto, T., & Twigg, J. (2007). Perangkat untuk Mengarusutamakan Pengurangan Risiko Bencana: Catatan Panduan bagi Lembaga-Lembaga yang Bergerak dalam Bidang Pembangunan. ProVention Consortium Secretariat, Switzerland, 75.

Bessette, J. M., & Pitney, J. J. (2010). American Government and Politics: Deliberation, Democracy and Citizenship. Cengage Learning. https://books.google.co.id/ books?id=8uu8cevL2iUC

Cahyono, E. (2017). Perlindungan Hak. Sayogya Institute.

Cook, J., Oreskes, N., Doran, P. T., Anderegg, W. R. L., Verheggen, B., Maibach, E. W., Carlton, J. S., Lewandowsky, S., Skuce, A. G., Green, S. A., Nuccitelli, D., Jacobs, P., Richardson, M., Winkler, B., Painting, R., & Rice, K. (2016). Consensus on consensus: A synthesis of consensus estimates on human- caused global warming. Environmental Research Letters, 11(4), 1–7. https://doi. org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/4/048002

Dwiyanto, A. (2015). Reformasi Birokrasi Konseptual (Utari (ed.)). Gadjah Mada University Press, Anggota IKAPI. https:// ugmpress.ugm.ac.id/id/product/sosial- politik/reformasi-birokrasi-kontekstual

Dwiyanto, A. (2017). Memimpin perubahan di birokrasi pemerintah : catatan kritis seorang akademisi. Gadjah Mada University Press. https://ugmpress.ugm.ac.id/id/product/ sosial-politik/memimpin-per ubahan- di-birokrasi-pemerintah-catatan-kritis- akademisi-praktisi

Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Parmar, B. L., & de Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder Theory: The State of the Art. Cambridge University Press. https://books.google. co.id/books?id=xF8-WN1QlIMC

Indrati, M. F. (2020). Ilmu Perundang-undangan 2 : Proses dan Teknik Pembentukannya (23rd ed.). Kanisius. https://simpus.mkri.id/opac/ detail-opac?id=10343

Kasarda , J. D. (2019). Aerot ropol is. In Th e Wiley Blackwell Enc yclopedia of Urban an d Reg ional St udies (pp. 1–7). W il ey. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118568446. eurs0436

Klaus, S. (2018). The Global Competitiveness Report. In World Economic Forum.

Martinovski, B., Mao, W., Gratch, J., & Marsella, S. (2005). Mitigation Theory: An Integrated Approach. May 2014, 1–6.

McGee, R., Gaventa, J., Barrett, G., Calland, R., Carlitz, R., Joshi, A., & Acosta, A. M. (2010). Review of Impact and Effectiveness of Transparency and Accountability Initiatives: Synthesis Report. Transparency and Accountability Initiative Workshop, October, 55.

Mileti, D. S., & Peek-Got t schl ich, L. (2001). Hazards and Sustainable Development in the United States. Risk Management, 3(1), 61–70. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave. rm.8240077

Prioteasa, A.-L., Ștefan, V.-E., & Nadia Ciocoiu, C. (2018). Enterprise Risk Management Imp lementation: a Review of Good Practice. July 2020, 749–760. https://doi. org/10.31410/itema.2018.749

Scolobig, A., Thompson, M., & Linnerooth-Bayer, J. A. (2016). Compromise not consensus: designinga participatory process for landslide risk mitigation. Natural Hazards, 81, 45–68. https://doi.or g/10.1007/ s11069-015-2078-y

van Iersel, M., Greenberg, H. E., & Westrick, M. L. (2017). Structured Risk Assessment for First- in-Human Studies. Therapeutic Innovation and Regulatory Science, 51(3), 288–297. https:// doi.org/10.1177/2168479017705156/ METRICS

WHO, (2013). Emergency Risk Management for Health OVERVIEW; Global Platform - May 2013. The World Health Organization, Public Health England and partners.

Yang, K., & Callahan, K. (2007). Citizen Involvement Efforts and Bureaucratic Responsiveness: Participatory Values, Stakeholder Pressures, and Administrative Practicality. Public Administration Review, 67, 249–264. https:// doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00711.x

Yang, Z. J., Rickard, L. N., Harrison, T. M., & Seo, M. (2014). Applying the Risk Information Seeking and Processing Model to Examine Support for Climate Change Mitigation Policy. Science Communication, 36(3), 296–324. https:// doi.org/10.1177/1075547014525350