Persistent Developmental Limits to Devising Policy Innovation for Innovation Policies in Emerging Economies

Main Article Content

Defny Holidin

Abstract

Promising industrial profiles of Southeast Asian emerging economies have met their developmental limits in the face of the Asian Financial Crisis in the late 1990s. However, following the crisis, they have not been successful in upscaling the technological competitiveness of their industries. By applying the national innovation system approach originally developed in advanced western economies as an institutional mechanism of policy innovation in light of developmentalism, I seek to explain these persistent developmental limits in Malaysia and Indonesia. My qualitative research examines literature discussing policy coordination mechanisms in innovation policies and policy documents containing coordination mechanisms involving firms, universities, and government agencies; then, how these issues implicate innovation policies in the two countries. I employ a comparative institutional analysis between them focusing on institutional characteristics of the national innovation systems, specifically their institutional obstacles occurring within development paths amidst prevailing political environments. I suggest that persistent developmental limits in Malaysia and Indonesia result from systemic failures of achieving developmental aims regardless of their politico-administrative regimes. Existing institutional frameworks of the national innovation systems, entrenched in the socio-economic prevalence of the two countries, have not fit the nations’ developmental aims pursued upon innovation upgrading.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
HOLIDIN, Defny. Persistent Developmental Limits to Devising Policy Innovation for Innovation Policies in Emerging Economies. Policy & Governance Review, [S.l.], v. 6, n. 1, p. 1-16, jan. 2022. ISSN 2580-4820. Available at: <https://journal.iapa.or.id/pgr/article/view/386>. Date accessed: 19 jan. 2022. doi: https://doi.org/10.30589/pgr.v6i1.386.
Section
Articles

References

Andhik a, L., Nur asa, H ., Kar lina, N ., & Chandradewini, C. (2018). Logic model of governance innovation and public policy in public service. Policy & Governance Review, 2(2), 85-98. https://doi.org/10.30589/pgr. v2i2.86.

Aswicahyono, H. & Hill, H. (2014). Survey of recent developments. Bulletin of Indonesian Economics Studies, 50(3), 319—346. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2014.980374.

Basri, M. C. (2013). The second East Asian miracle? Political economy of Asian responses to the 1997/98 and 2008/09 crises (A tale of two crises: Indonesia’s political economy). JICA-RI Working Paper 57, JICA Research Institute, Shinjuku-ku. Retrieved from http://jica-ri.jica.go.jp/publication/assets/ JICA-RI_WP_No.57_2013.

Bates, R. (2014). The new institutionalism: The work of Douglas North. Retrieved from http://scholar.harvard.edu/rbates/ publications/new-institutionalism-work- douglas-north.

Boland, W. P., Phillips, P. W. B., Ryan, C. D., & McPhee-Knowles, S. (2012). Collaboration and the generation of new knowledge in networked innovation systems: A bibliometric analysis. The 10 th Triple Helix Conference. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 52, 15—24. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.437.

Cai, Y. (2015). What contextual factors shape ‘innovation in innovation’? Integration of insights from the triple helix and the institutional logics perspective. Social Science Information, 54(3), 299—326. https://doi. org/10.1177/0539018415583527.

Carayannis, E. G. & Campbell, D. F. J. (2014). Developed democracies versus emerging autocracies: Arts, democracy, and innovation in quadruple helix innovation systems. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 3(1), 1—23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s1373101400122.

Carney, R. W. & Witt, M. A. (2014). The role of the state in asian business systems. In: M. A. Witt & G. Redding. (Eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Asian Business System. Oxford: Oxford Uni. Press, 538—560.

Chandran, V. G. R., Sundram, V. P. K., & Santhidran, S. (2013). Innovation systems in Malaysia: A perspective of university—industry R & D Collaboration. AI & Soc xx(xx), xx-xx. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s00146-013-0468-9.

Chen, S-H. (2014). The confluence of academia and industry: A case study of the taiwanese biopharmaceutical innovation system. Review of Policy Research, 31(5), 408—429. https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12089.

Cherif, R., & Hasanov, F. (2015). The leap of the tiger: how Malaysia can escape the middle- income t ra p. I MF Working Paper 131. http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/ wp/2015/wp15131.

Degelsegger, A., Gruber, F., Remoe, S. O., & Trienes, R. (Eds.). (2014). Spotlight on: Stimulating innovation in Southeast Asia. Center for Social Innovation (ZSI), SEA-EU-NE T, August. Retrieved from http://www.zsi. at/object/news/3282/attach/1_SEA-EU- NET_Buch_Web.

Doner, R. F., Ritchie, B. K., & Slater, D. (2005). Systemic vulnerability and the origins of developmental states: Northeast and Southeast Asia in comparative perspective. International Organization, 59, 327—361. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1017/ S002081830505013.

Ebner, A. (2008). Institutional evolution and the political economy of governance”. In: A. Ebner and N. Beck (Eds.). The institutions of the market: Organizations, social systems, and governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 287—308.

Ebner, A. (2016). Institutional transformations of technology policy in East Asia: The rise of the entrepreneurial state. In U. Hilpert (Ed.). Routledge Handbook of Politics and Technology. London: Routledge, 367—379.

Edquist , C. (2005). Systems of Innovat ion: Perspectives and Challenges. In: J. Fagerberg, D. C. Mowery, & R. R. Nelson, (Eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 181—208.

Edquist, C. (Ed.). (1997). Systems of innovation: Technologies, institutions, and organizations. London: Pinter.

Evans, P. (1995). Embedded autonomy: States and industrial transformation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Evans, P. (2011). The ca pa b il it y enha ncing developmental state: Concepts and national trajectories. Discussion Paper 63, Niteroi: Brazil: Centro de Estudos sobre Desiguldade e Desenvolvimento.

Evers, H-D, & Gerke, S. (2015). Knowledge cluster formation as a science policy in Malaysia: Lessons learned. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 34(1), 115—137.

Fagerberg, J. (2016). Innovation policy: Rationales, lessons, and challenges. Journal of Economic Sur v eys , 00 (00), 1—17. https://doi. org/10.1111/joes.12164.

Fagerberg, J. and Verspagen, B. (2009). Innovation studies: The emerging structure of a new scientific field. Research Policy, 38, 218—233.

Foxon, T., Makuch, Z., Mata, M., & Pearson, P. (2004). Innovation systems and policy-making proces s f or the trans ition t o sustainability. In: K. Jacob, M. Binder, & A. Wieczorek (Eds.). Governance for Industrial Transformation. Proceedings of the 2003 Berlin Conference on the Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change. Berlin: Environmental Policy Research Center, 96—112.

Freeman, C. (Ed.) (1987). Technology policy and economic performance: Lessons from Japan. London: Pinter.

Göbel, C. & Maslow, S. (2013). Assessing pathways to success: Need for reform and governance capacities in Asia. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung. Retrieved from http://news.sgi- network.org/ uploads/tx_amsgistudies/ Assessing_Pathways_to_Success_Goebel_ Maslow_01.

Godin, B. (2009). National innovation system: The system approach in historical perspective. Science Technology Human Values, 34(4), 476 —501. https: //doi.org/10.1177/0162243908329187.

Groenewegen, J. & van der Steen, M. (2006). The evolution of national innovation systems”. Journal of Economic Issues, 40(2), 277—285. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4228249.

Haggard, S. (2015) The developmental state is dead: Long live the developmental state! In: J. Mahoney & K. Thelen (Eds.). Advances in Comparative-Historical Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge Uni. Press, 39—66.

Hashim, F. (2012). Challenges for the internationalization of SMEs and the role of government: The case of Malaysia. Journal of International Business and Economy, 13(1), 97—122. http://www.i-jibe.org/achive/2012spring/5-Hashim%20(2012).

Hil l , H. (2014). Is t here a Sout heast Asia n development model? In: Schulze, G. G. (Ed.). Discussion Series Paper 26, Freiburg: Dept. International Economic Policy, University of Freiburg.

Hill, H., Yean, T. S., & Mat Zin, R. H. (Eds.) (2012). Malaysia’s development challenges: Graduating from the middle. Oxford: Routledge.

Johnson, C. (1982) MITI and the Japanese miracle: The growth of industrial policy, 1925—1975. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Kastelle, T., Potts, J., & Dodgson, M. (2009). The evolution of innovation systems. The DRUID Summer Conference, Copenhagen Business School, Frederiksberg, Denmark, June 17—19. http://www2.druid.dk/conferences/viewpaper.php?id=5835&cf=32.

Kemristekdikti RI (Kementerian Riset, Teknologi, dan Pendidikan Tinggi Republik Indonesia) (2017). “Rencana Induk Riset Nasional Tahun 2017-2045, Ed. February”. Jakarta.

Kohli, A. (2004). State-directed development: Political power and industrialization in the global periphery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kuncoro, A. (2012). Globalization and innovation in Indonesia: Evidence from micro-data on medium and lar ge manufactur ing establishments. ERIA Discussion Paper, 9.

Lakitan, B. (2013). Connecting all the dots: Identifying the ‘actor level’ challenges in establishing effective innovation system in Indonesia. Technology in Society, 35(1), 41 —54. https: //d oi.or g/10.10 16/j. techsoc.2013.03.002.

List, F. (1856). National system of political economy. G. A. Matile (transl.). Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott & Co. http://larouchejapan.com/japanese/drupal-6.14/sites/default/files/ text/List_National-System-of-Political- Economy.pdf.

Lundvall, B-Å. (Ed.). (1992). National systems of innovation: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Pinter.

Magro, E., Navarro, M., & Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, J.M. (2014). Coordination-mix: The hidden face of STI Policy”. Review of Policy Research, 31(5), 367—389, https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12090.

Martini, L., Tjakraatmadja, J. H., Anggoro, Y., Pritasari, A., & Hutapea, L. (2012) Triple helix collaboration to develop economic corridors as knowledge hub in Indonesia. The 10th Triple Helix Conference, Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 52, 130—139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. sbspro.2012.09.449.

Meissner, D., Polt, W., & Vonortas, N. S. (2016). Towards abrad understanding of innovation and its importance for innovation policy. The Journal of Technology Transfer,41, 1—28, ht t ps://doi.or g/10.1007/s10961-016-9485-4.

Metcalfe, S. (1997). Technology systems and t ech no lo gy po licy in an evo lutio nar y framework. In: D. Archibugi & J. Michie (E ds.). Tec h nolog y, g lobaliz at ion an d ec on omic per f or man c e . Ca mb ridg e: Cambridge University Press, 268—296.

Mietzner, M. (2015). Indonesia: Democratic consolidation and stagnation under Yudho y ono, 2004-2014. In: W. Case (Ed.). Routledge Handbook of Southeast Asian Democratization. NY: Routledge, 370—383.

Moeliodihardjo, B. Y., Soemardi, B. W., Brodjonegoro, S. S., & Hatakenaka, S. (2012). University, industry, and government partnership: Its present and future challenges in Indonesia”. The 10th Triple Helix Conference, Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences,52, 307—316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.468.

Nelson, R. (Ed.). (1993). National innovation system: A comparative analysis. Oxford: Oxford Uni. Press.

OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development). (2013). Innovation in Southeast Asia. OECD Reviews of Innovation Policy. https://doi. org/10.1787/9789264128712-en.

Pepinsky, T. B. (2009). Economic crisis and the breakdown of authoritarian regimes: Indonesian and Malaysia in comparative perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Pepinsky, T. B. (2012). The second East Asian mir a cl e? P ol it ical econom y of asia n responses to the 1997/1998 and 2008/09 crises (99 Problems but a crisis ain’t one political business and external vulnerability in island Southeast Asia). JICA-RI Working Paper 43, JICA Research Institute.

Putera, P. B. & Jannah, L. M. (2012). Science & technology and innovation policies in science & technological research, development, and implementation. Bisnis & Birokrasi: Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi dan Organisasi, 19(3), 206—215, http://journal.ui.ac.id--index. php--jbb--article--viewFile--1857--1472.

Rasiah, R. (20 0 8). Ind ustr ial clus t er ing in electronics in Indonesia and Malaysia. In: I. Kuroiwa & T. M. Heng (Eds.). Production networks and industrial clusters: Integrating economies in Southeast Asia. Singapore: JETRO Institute of Developing Economies, pp. 127—157.

Rasiah, R. (2011). Is Malaysia facing negative deindu strialization? Pacific Affairs, 84(4), 715-736, http://www.jstor.rg/stable/23056129.

Rasiah, R. (2015). The industrial policy experience of the electronics industry in Malaysia. WIDER Working Paper, 123, Korea International Cooperation Agency & United Nations University. http://www.wider.unu. edu/sites/default/files/wp2015-123.

Rasiah, R. & Yap, X-S. (2015). Inno vation Performance of the Malaysian Economy. In: D. Soumitra, B. Lanvin, and S. Wunsch- Vincent (Eds.). The Global Innovation Index 201 5: Ef fective innovation policies for development. Geneva: World Intellectual Property Organization, Cornell University, & INSEAD.

Rasiah, R., & Chandran, V.G.R. (2009). University- industry collaboration in the automotive, biotechnology, and electronics firms in Malaysia. Seoul Journal of Economics, 22(4), 529—550.

Sartika, D. (2019). Urgency of State Administration Innovation System (SINAGARA) on regional go v ernment perf ormance. P olic y & Governance Review, 3(3), 244-257. https:// doi.org/10.30589/pgr.v3i3.130.

Shair-Rosenfield, S., Marks, G., & Hooghe, L. (2014). A comparative measure of decentralization for Southeast Asia. Journal of East Asian Studies, 14, 85—107, http://www.unc. edu/~hooghe/assets/docs/papers/JEAS_ shair_rosenfield_marks_hooghe_2014.

Shetty, P., Akil, H., Fizzanty, T., & Simamora, G. (2014). Indonesia: The atlas of Islamic world science and innovation country case study. San Francisco, CA: Creative Commons.

Soenarso, S.W., & Sadewo, H. (2014). A strategy to increase indonesian private sector R&D investment. Tech Monitor, April-June, 25—31. http://www.techmonitor.net/tm/images/4/4e/14apr_jun_sf3.

Soenarso, S.W., Nugraha, D., & Listyaningrum, E. (2013). Development of Science and Technology Park (STP) in Indonesia to support innovati on-based regional economy: concept and early stage development. World Technopolis Review, 2, https://doi.org/10.7165/wtr2013.2.1.32.

Soumitra, D., Lanvin, B., & Wunsch-Vincent , S. (Eds.). (2015). The Global Innovation Index 2015: Effective innovation policies for development. Geneva: WIPO, Cornell University, & INSEAD.

Springer, S. (2009) Renewed authoritarianism in Southeast Asia: Undermining democracy through neoliberal reform. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 50(3), 271—276.

Teixeira, A. A. C. (2014). Evolution, roots and influence of the literature on national systems of innovation: A Bibliometric Account. Cambridge Journal of Economics,38, 181—214. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bet022.

Thee, K.W. (2006). Technology and Indonesia’s industrial competitiveness. Discussion Paper 43, Asian Development Bank Institute.

Thiruchelvam, K., Chandran, V. G. R., Boon-Kwee, Ng., Wong, C. Y. , & Chee, K. S . (2011) . Innovation financing in Asia: The experience of Malaysia. Report prepared for IDRC.

Tijaja, J., & Faisal, M. (2014). Industrial policy in Indonesia: A Gl obal v al ue chain p ersp ect ive. A sian D ev elopment B an k (ADB) Economics Working Paper Series 411. http://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/ publication/110982/ewp-411.

Tipton, F. B. (2009). Southeast Asian capitalism: History, institutions, states, and firms. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 26, 401—434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s104900089118z.

Touchton, M . (2015). Trapping t he tigers: Regulation of market entry and the rule of law in SE Asia. The Social Science Journal, 52, 8—21.

Ufen, A. (2013). The 2013 Malaysian elections: Business as usual or part of a protracted transition? Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 32(2), 3—17.

Wade, R. (2003). Governing the market: Economic Theory and the role of government in east asian industrialization . Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Watkins, A., Papaioannou, Mugwagwa, J., & Kale, D. (2014). National innovation systems, developing countr ies , and the role of intermediaries: A critical review of the literature. Open University’s Innovation Knowledge Development Working Paper 7,

WEF (World Economic Forum). (2015). The Global Competitiveness Report 2015—2016. Geneva: The World Economic Forum.

World Bank. (2016a.) Data: Malaysia. Retrieved from http://data.worldbank.org/country/ malaysia.

World Bank (2016b) Data: Indonesia. Retrieved from http://data.worldbank.org/country/ indonesia.

Yananda, M.R., Maksum, I.R., & Fathurahman, H . (2017). Pr omoting collabor ation in jabodetabekjur: A learning regions perspective on knowledge-based economy. Policy & Governance Review, 1(1), 37-54. https://doi.org/10.30589/pgr.v1i1.29.

Yusof, Z. N. M. (2013). The role of university- industry-government relationship in cluster development: The case of MSC Malaysia. PhD Diss, University of Stirling, Scotland, UK.

Zanello, G., Fu, X., Mohen, P., & Ventresca, M. (20 15). The creation and d iffus ion of innovation in developing countries: A systematic literature review. Journal of Economic Sur v ey, 1—29 . https ://doi. org/10.1111/joes.12126.