Main Article Content
This article aims to elucidate the tradition of Japan’s public administration emphasizing the civil service system. A number of studies explain the impact of the tradition (norms, values, and institutions), in shaping the process and result of public administration reform. By applying the historical institutionalism perspective, this study reveals how the legacy of the past, the tradition promoted by the Meiji Restoration, creates the new tradition of public administration. This study selects Japan as a typical case representing Asian developmentalists. The remarkable Meiji restoration marked the process of adoption and adjustment of the Germanic traditions in the bureaucracy modernization. Norm institutionalization has established the new norms and civil service system. The basic norms consist of legality, consensus, and seniority. It develops the "kyaria" denoting recruitment, selection, and promotion influenced by seniority, long term performance, and prestigious university recommendation and produces competent and dominant mandarins in the policy process. However, the parliament continuously initiates the reform to reduce the mandarin's domination and heighten political control over the bureaucracy. The reform has not yet changed the power balance of two institutions since the ”kyaria's” embeddedness in Japan's polity produces two consequences. First, it contributes to public administration modernization. The mandarin’s outstanding performance increases political legitimacy and social acceptance to the "kyaria"system. Second, the parliament cannot drastically reduce the mandarin’s role since the lifetime employment model enriches them with knowledge and experience of the government affairs. Conducting cautious reform and, at the same time, working closely with the mandarin are the primary reform strategy of the parliament.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Anagnoson, J. T. (2011). The United States Civil Service. In A. Massey, International Handbook on Civil Service Systems (pp. 125-151). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Bekke, H., Perry, J. L., & Toonen, T. A. (1996). Civil Service System. Indianapolis, USA: Indiana University Press.
Boin, A., & Christensen, T. (2008). The Development of Public Institutions: Reconsidering the Role of Leadership. Administration & Society, 40 (3), 271-297.
Burns, J. P. (2015). Explaining Civil Service Reform in Asia. In v. d. Meer, F. M, & T. A. Jos C.N. Raadschelders, Comparative Civil Service System in the 21th Century (pp. 77-94). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Brinkerhoff, D. W., & Goldsmith., A. A. (2002). Clientelism, Patrimonialism and Democratic Governance: An Overview and Framework for Assessment and Programming. Massacussetts, USA: USAID.
Drechsler, W. (2013). The Paradigm of Governance and Administration, Chinese, Wetern, and Islamic. Society and Economy , 35, 319-342.
Gerring, J. (2007). Case Study: Principles and Practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Halligan, J. (2003). Anglo-American Civil Service Systems: Comparative Perspectives. In J. Halligan, Civil Service Systems in Anglo-American Countries (pp. 195-216). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Horton, S. (2011). Contrasting Anglo-American and Continental European Civil Serice Systems. In A. Massey, International Handbook on Civil Service Systems (pp. 31-53). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Imanaka, Y. (2010). Civil Service Reform in Japan. In E. M. Berman, M. J. Moon, & H. Choi, Public Administration in East Asia (pp. 291-304). Boca Raton: CRC Press.
Immergut, E. M. (1998). The Theoretical Core of the New Institutionalism. Politics & Society, 26 (1), 5-34.
Jay M. Shafritz, J. M., Riccucci, N. M., Rosenbloom, D. H., & Hyde, A. C. (2001). Personnel Management in Government: Politics and Process, Fourth Edition, Revised and Expanded. New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc.
Jun, J. S., & Muto, H. (1995). The Hidden Dimensions of Japanese Administration: Culture and Its Impact. Public Administration Review , 55 (2), 125-134.
Kim, P. S. (2000). A study on the Kim Dae-jung government’s reform process. 38:. Korean Journal of Public Administration , 217–252.
Kim, P. S. (2002). Civil Service Reform in Japan and Korea: Toward Competitiveness and Competency. International Review of Administrative Sciences , 68, 389–403.
Kim, P. S. (2010). The civil service system in the Republic of Korea. . In E. M. Berman, Public administration in East Asia. New York, USA: CRC Press.
Mahoney, J. (2001). Path-Dependent Explanations of Regime Change: Central America in Comparative Perspective. Studies in Comparative International Development ,36 (1), 111–141.
Mahoney, J., & Thelen, K. (2010). A Theory of Gradual Institutional Change. In J. Mahoney, & K. Thelen, Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency, and Power (pp. 1-37). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Massey, A. (2011). Civil service systems: introduction and scope of the book. In A. Massey, International Handbook on Civil Service Systems (pp. 3-12). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Massey, A. (2011). International Handbook on Civil Service Systems. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Masujima, T. (2005). Administrative Reform in Japan: Past Developments and Future Trends. International Review of Administrative Sciences , 71 (2), 295-308.
Minns, J. (2006). The Politics of Developmentalism: The Midas States of Mexico, South Korea, and Taiwan. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Mishima, K. (2017). A Big Bang for Japanese Mandarins? The Civil Service Reform of 2014. International Journal of Public Administration , 40, 1101-1113.
Nakamura, A. (2003). Public Administration in Japan: The Need for Reform . In K. K. Tummala, Comparative Bureaucratic Systems. Lanham, USA: Lexington Books.
Nakamura, A., & Kikuchi, M. (2011). Japanes Public Administration at the Crossroads: Declining Trust in Government and Civil Serivce Reform in the Age of Fiscal Retrenchment. In A. Massey, International Handbook of Civil Service System (pp. 282-304). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Painter, M. (2010). Legacies Remembered, Lessons Forgotten: the Case of Japan. In M. a. Painter,Tradition and Public Administration (pp. 84-98). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Painter, M., & Peters, B. G. (2010). The Analysis of Administrative Traditions. In M. a. Painter, Tradition and Public Administration (pp. 3-18). New York: Palgrave Macmillan
Hall, P. A., & Taylor, R. C. (1996). Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms. Political Studies , XLIV, 936-957.
Parry, R. (2011). The United Kingdom Civil Service: A Devolving System. In A. Massey, International Handbook on Civil Service Systems (pp. 347-368). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Pierson, P. (2000). Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics. The American Political Science Review , 94 (2), 251-267.
Raadschelders, J. C., Toonen, T. A., & Van der Meer, F. M. (2007). Civil Service Systems and the Challenges of the 21st Century. In J. C. Raadschelders, & T. A. Meer, The Civil Service in the 21st Century (pp. 1-16). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Raadschelders, J. C., Toonen, T. A., & Van Der Meer, F. M. (2015). Civil Service Systems and the Challenges of the 21st Century. In F. M. Meer, J. C. Raadschelders, & T. A. Toonen, Comparative Civil Systems in the 21st Century (pp. 1-14). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Sausman, C., & Locke., R. (2004). The British Civil Service: Examining the Question of Politicization. In B. G. (Eds), Politicization of the Civil Service in Comparative Perspective: The Quest for Control (pp. 101-124). London: Routledge.
Shepard, G. (2003). Civil Service Reform in Developing Countries: Why Is It Going Badly? 11th International Anti-Corruption Conference. Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Shimizu, Y. (2020). The Origins of the Modern Japanese Bureaucracy. London: Bloomsbury Publishing Plc.
Sylvia, H. (2011). Contrasting Anglo-American and Continental European civil service systems. In A. Massey, International Handbook on Civil Service Systems (pp. 327-346). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Thelen, K. (1999). Historical Institutonalism in Comparative Politcs. Annual Review of Political Science , 369–404.
Thelen, K. (2004). How Institutions Evolve: The Political Economy of Skills in Germany, Britain, the United States, and Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wright, M. (1999). Who Govern Japan? Politicians and Bureaucrats in the Policy-making Processes. Political Studies , XLVII, 939-954.
Yesilkagit, K. (2010). The Future of Administrative Tradition: Tradition as Ideas and Structures. In M. a. Painter, Tradition and Public Administration (pp. 14-157). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.